|
Roy
Sherwood
Dr Roy Sherwood
Dept of Clinical Biochemistry
King's College Hopsital
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 9RS
Download as a
PDF here
9.1 Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women with
180,000 new cases and 45,000 occurring annually in the USA. The
lifetime risk for a woman for developing breast cancer is 1 in 8,
with a greater risk in the presence of a family history of breast
or ovarian cancer. Over the past 10 years the mortality rate from
breast cancer has been slowly decreasing, probably due to a
combination of earlier detection from breast screening programmes
and improvements in available treatments. Treatment of breast
cancer uses a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, hormonal
manipulation and adjuvant chemotherapy. Hormone therapy is most
effective in the post-menopausal patient whose tumour is positive
for oestrogen receptors (ER+). Adjuvant chemotherapy is most
effective in pre-menopausal women, with anthracycline-based therapy
probably superior to most other types. Surgical treatment of breast
cancer relies on removal of the tumour with as wide an excision
margin as possible, which may necessitate mastectomy. Auxiliary
sampling and dissection aids in the staging of the disease and may
help prevent spread.
Diagnosis of breast cancer is based on history and examination,
radiology and cytological/histological examination of needle
aspirates or biopsies. There are no biomarkers at present that help
in the diagnosis, with the possible exception of the carbohydrate
antigen marker CA15-3. Detection of gene mutations in the BRCA1 or
BRCA2 genes indicate an increased risk of developing familial
breast cancer and some women opt for prophylactic mastectomy if
found to be positive for the mutations. There are, however, markers
that are important in assessing prognosis. Classical histological
prognostic factors include the type of tumour, grade, size,
vascularization and the lymph node status. The Nottingham
Prognostic Index (NPI) incorporates tumour grade (1-3), size (0.2 x
size in mm) and lymph node involvement (number of nodes involved
and score: 0=1, <4=2, >4=3). An NPI <3.4 is associated
with a five year survival rate of 89%, whereas a NPI>5.6 has a
five year survival rate of only 29%. Molecular factors that have
been shown to provide prognostic information include oestrogen
receptors, DNA ploidy, proliferation growth factors (e.g. EGFR),
oncogenes (HER-2/neu, ras etc.) and tumour suppressor genes (p53).
Recent development of a drug that targets the oncogene HER-2/neu
has heralded a new era of biomarkers with the potential to direct
therapy.
9.2 HER-2/neu
HER-2 refers to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and is
also known as neu, HER-2/neu and c-erbB-2. Other members of the
type I growth factor family include EGFR (erbB-1), HER-3 and HER-4.
The HER-2 gene is located on chromosome 17 (17q 11-q12) and encodes
a transmembrane glycoprotein, p185. The intracellular domain of the
protein has tyrosine kinase activity promoting cell growth. The
extracellular domain of the protein (97-115 kDa) is shed into the
circulation and is measurable in plasma/serum samples. The target
ligand for HER-2/neu has not been identified, but activation has
been demonstrated following binding of growth factor to adjacent
receptors with subsequent dimerization.
Autophosphorylation and gene activation then occurs. HER-2/neu
is expressed in many normal cells with up to 100,000 copies per
cell. Over-expression occurs by gene amplification or by increased
gene copies and in some tumours may be increased up to 40-fold.
Cancers in which HER-2/neu over-expression has been reported
include: breast, ovarian, endometrial, pancreatic, gastric and
salivary gland. Most studies to date, however, have focused on
HER-2/neu over-expression in breast cancer.
9.3 HER-2/neu and
breast cancer
Many studies have now determined the proportion of women with
advanced breast cancer whose tumours are over-expressing HER-2/neu
and although there is a wide spread of results the concensus is
that 30-40% of such tumours are HER-2/neu positive. The figure is
much lower in studies that included primary breast cancer, although
the proportion may be as high as 40-60% in ductal carcinomas.
Tumour cells over-expressing HER-2/neu have been shown to have a
higher cell proliferation rate, are associated positively with
mitotic activity and negatively with estrogen receptor status.In
vivoHER-2/neu positive tumours have been shown to metastasise
faster. Patients with breast cancers over-expressing the HER-2/neu
oncogene respond differently to endocrine and chemotherapy, have
decreased disease-free intervals and overall survival times than do
those who are HER-2/neu negative and are candidates for Herceptin
therapy.In vitrostudies have shown that cells transfected with
HER-2/neu acquire resistance to tamoxifen, cisplatin, 5-fluoruracil
and carboplatin, chemotherapy agents commonly used in the treatment
of breast cancer.
9.4 Herceptin
Herceptin� (trastuzamab, Roche) is a humanized antibody targeted
to HER-2/neu. It has been shown to decrease the proliferation rate
in cells over-expressing HER-2/neu. Patients with HER-2/neu
positive tumours treated with Herceptin had a 50% improvement in
response, whereas there was no response in HER-2/neu negative
patients. Limited studies have shown some benefit of a combination
of Herceptin and chemotherapy or taxanes. It is important,
therefore, in order to maximise the benefit of using Herceptin
therapy, that women whose tumours are over-expressing HER-2/neu are
correctly identified.
9.5 Assessment of
tumour HER-2/neu status
The current method for assessing the HER-2/neu status of a
tumour is to use histological techniques such as
immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridisation
(FISH) on the primary tumour or metastases available for biopsy.
Recently, however, immunoassays have become available to measure
the extracellular domain (ECD) in the blood plasma/serum (Bayer
Diagnostics).
Immunohistochemistry uses mono- or polyclonal antibodies against
HER-2/neu that are visualised by a chromogenic reaction via enzyme
linking. The extent of staining at the cytoplasmic membrane is
assessed and scored 0-3+. Those tumours that are 3+ are considered
to be HER-2/neu positive and the patient is a candidate for
Herceptin therapy. Some studies have also incorporated 2+ subjects
in the Herceptin treatment arm. FISH allows the detection of
specific nucleic acid sequences using a single stranded DNA probe
annealed to the complementary target sequence and visualised using
a fluorescent tag. A second different coloured fluorescent tag
attached to a DNA probe to a housekeeping gene allows expression of
the results as a ratio. A ratio greater than two is considered to
indicate HER-2/neu positivity.
Whilst accepted as the standard method for determining HER-2/neu
positivity in breast cancer the techniques available are
technically demanding, semi-quantitative and are subject to the
experience of the pathologist viewing the slides. Histological
assessment represents the HER-2/neu status at a single point in
time � at biopsy or removal of the primary tumour � which may be
years prior to recurrence. In some cases, tissue samples from
metastases may not be accessible (brain or bone metastases) and it
must be assumed that the HER-2/neu status of the tumour has not
altered over time.
The availability of serum-based HER-2/neu assays allows �real
time� assessment of HER-2/neu status with easily obtained samples.
Serum Her-2/neu measurements are quantitative and repeat testing is
possible for longitudinal monitoring of therapy. Herceptin does not
interfere with the serum HER-2/neu assay. Measurement of serum
HER-2/neu in 242 healthy women produced an upper limit of the
reference range of 15 �g/L. In benign breast disease 3.3% of women
had serum HER-2/neu concentrations above this cut-off, whilst in
those with Stages I & II breast cancer the proportion with
raised serum HER-2/neu was 3.8%, bearing out the low figures seen
in primary breast cancer using histological methods. In stage III
disease 18.4% were above 15 �g/L and in Stage IV disease there were
35.0% of women with raised serum HER-2/neu (Table 1).
Table 1 Serum
HER-2/neu-2/neu concentrations in breast disease (�g/L)
| |
Healthy Women |
Benign Breast Disease |
Breast Cancer Stage I & II |
Stage III |
Stage IV |
| N |
242 |
210 |
105 |
49 |
103 |
| Median |
9.0 |
9.3 |
9.8 |
10.3 |
12.5 |
| Mean � S.D |
9.2 � 2.7 |
9.6 � 2.7 |
10.7 � 7.6 |
12.3 � 5.2 |
75.2 � 533 |
| > 15 (%) |
2.9 |
3.3 |
3.8 |
18.4 |
35.0 |
Increased concentrations of serum HER-2/neu have been associated
with poor response to chemotherapy as for those where
over-expression of HER-2/neu was assessed at the tissue level.
There have now been over 25 studies that have demonstrated that the
overall survival time or disease free survival time is shorter in
women with increased serum HER-2/neu concentrations, whether
treated with hormonal therapy or chemotherapy.
Serial measurement of serum HER-2/neu can be useful in
monitoring response to Herceptin therapy. A falling concentration
indicates an adequate response; whilst a steady or rising value may
indicate inadequate dosage. The half-life of Herceptin in the
circulation appears to be dependent on the concentration of the
HER-2/neu ECD in the bloodstream. Where the plasma HER-2/neu
concentration is low Herceptin has a half-life of 10 days whereas
in the presence of high plasma HER-2/neu concentrations the
half-life can be as short as 2 days. The measurement of serum
HER-2/neu can, therefore, be used as a guide to the required dosage
of Herceptin to achieve therapeutic concentrationsin vivo.
References
- Carney WP, Neumann R, Lipton A, Leitzel K, Ali S, Price CP.
Potential clinical utility of serum HER-2/neu-2/neu oncoprotein
concentrations in patients with breast cancer. Clin Chem 49:
1579-98; 2003.
- Kureybashi J. Biological and clinical significance of HER2
overexpression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 8: 45-51 2001.
- McKeage K, Peery CM. Trastuzamab. A review of its use in the
treament of metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER-2/neu-2.
Drugs 62: 209-43 2002.
- Schwartz MK, Smith C, Schwartz DC, Dnistrian A, Neiman I.
Monitoring therapy by serum HER-2/neu-2/neu. Int J Biol Markers 15:
324-9 2000.
|