Advancing excellence in laboratory medicine for better healthcare worldwide

Vol 19 n° 2

Header
4. BONE HEALTH IN CHILDHOOD: USEFULNESS OF BIOCHEMICAL BIOMARKERS


E. Eapen, V. Grey1, 2*, A. Don-Wauchope, S. A. Atkinson2

1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, and 2Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

*Corresponding Author: V.L.Grey, Associate Professor,
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine,
2N33- McMaster University Medical Centre,
1200 Main St W., Hamilton ON L8N 3Z5
Phone: 905-521-2100 x76595
Email: grey@hhsc.ca

download-as-pdf-file.jpg

Abstract

Development of the human skeleton begins in early embryonic life and continues through childhood into early adulthood. The acquisition of peak bone mass during these vulnerable periods may impact on skeletal fragility in later adult years. Once the skeleton has reached maturity, bone remodelling continues with periodic replacement of old bone with new at the same location. Bone biomarkers are specifically derived biomarkers that reflect both formation by osteoblasts and resorption by osteoclasts. Children have significantly higher concentrations of bone biomarkers than adults due to both skeletal growth and rapid bone turnover during childhood and adolescence. Biochemical assessment of markers of bone turnover may be important in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of metabolic bone disease. This review will discuss the various serum bone markers used for assessing bone health and the factors that influence their utility.

A. Introduction
A1. Bone Biology
Bone organizes itself to form a rigid skeleton and thus provides a framework for the body. It is a specialized, mineralized connective tissue that consists of a mainly organic collagen matrix and a mineral phase together with bone cells. (Vasikaran et al., 2008) The cellular composition of bone includes osteoblasts, osteocytes, bone lining cells and osteoclasts, and its matrix contains both organic and inorganic components (Downey et al., 2006). While bone cells or osteocytes and bone matrix proteins such as collagen are produced by actively synthesizing osteoblasts, bone resorption involves terminally-differentiated, multinucleated osteoclasts (Vasikaran et al., 2008)

A2. Peak Bone Mass and Bone Remodelling
Development of the human skeleton begins in early embryonic life by the differentiation of cells into chondrocytes (cartilage-forming cells). The velocity of skeletal growth is high immediately after birth, slows down for a short while and increases again later in infancy. At this stage, longitudinal bone growth is more rapid in the appendicular (arms and legs) than axial skeleton (trunk) and remains so until puberty whereupon axial bone growth accelerates and long bones decelerate until the epiphyses fuse (Prentice et al., 2006). The acquisition of peak bone mass also known as full adult bone mass is important for optimal skeletal health. It represents the ability to acquire the full genetic potential for bone strength, which can be considered as bone of a size and mass which has not been inhibited by nutrient insufficiencies and/or sub-optimal mechanical loading (Ho et al., 2005). It is achieved almost fully by late adolescence or early adulthood with more than one quarter of this being accrued during the 2 years around peak pubertal height velocity (Specker et al., 2002). Chronic under-nutrition, as well as inadequate intakes of bone forming minerals (Ca, Zn) and micronutrients (vitamin D) can impair growth and hence bone production. Longitudinal studies helped determine that bone mass tracks through childhood and adolescence, and any interruptions in the normal trajectory of bone mass accretion during these vulnerable periods may impact on skeletal fragility in later adult years (Atkinson et al., 2008).

Remodelling of bone starts in fetal life, and once, the skeleton is fully developed in young adulthood, accounts for most of the metabolic activity in bone. Bone remodelling or turnover is the continual process by which the skeleton is renewed through resorption (breakdown) of existing bone and formation of new bone. Since these processes occur in sequence, there is a temporary deficit of bone tissue called remodelling space (Prentice et al., 2006). There are several conditions such as, somatic growth, aging, metabolic bone disease, states of increased or decreased mobility, and therapeutic interventions, which can disturb the bone remodelling process producing a temporary phase lag while the system readjusts to the new remodelling rate often referred to as the �remodelling transient�. Children, with their rapid bone growth and reshaping, have larger remodelling spaces than adults and a shorter remodelling period (several weeks compared with 6-18 months for adults), therefore increasing the probability of detecting remodelling transients (Prentice et al., 2006; Atkinson et al., 2008; Seibel et al., 2005) . The measurement of biochemical markers in both blood and urine is a means of assessing bone remodelling processes, whereas bone densitometry is an assessment of peak bone mass.

A3. Assessment of Bone Health
Bone mineral status in healthy individuals can be estimated using several densitometry techniques including the gold standard dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Laskey et al., 2004; Ginty et al., 2005). DXA quantifies fat, lean and bone mineral masses and is the only widely used technique than can measure regions in both axial and appendicular skeleton.

DXA is widely used for the measurement of bone status in children (Compston et al., 1995). It has several advantages including: high accessibility; low ionizing radiation dose (equivalent to about less than 1 day naturally occurring radiation); precision; and more recently the availability of pediatric reference data for measures of whole body, lumbar spine and hip using Hologic DXA machines (Kalkwarf et al., 2007) and a different reference data base using Lunar DXA machines (Van der Sluis et al., 2002). In children, total body bone mineral content (BMC) is the preferred measure over bone mineral density (BMD), which is a two-dimensional measure (not volumetric) calculated as BMC divided by bone area. Consequently, BMD is not perceived to be a sensitive measure of bone acquisition in childhood due to the continuous change in bone geometry and the inability to differentiate change due to bone growth or mineralization (Prentice et al., 2005; Goulding et al., 1996). Moreover, with increasing awareness of bone disorders , the interest in and the need for effective measures used in screening, diagnosis and follow up of such pathologies have obviously grown. Thus, in contrast to static measures obtained from imaging techniques such as DXA, laboratory tests play an integral role in the assessment and differential diagnosis of metabolic bone disease, especially since they are non-invasive, comparatively inexpensive and when applied and interpreted correctly, helpful tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic assessment of metabolic bone disease (Seibel et al., 2006).

Biochemical markers of bone metabolism help to detect the dynamics of the metabolic imbalance itself (Seibel et al., 2005). Currently, bone markers include both enzymes and peptides derived from cellular and non-cellular compartments of bone and are classified according to the metabolic processes they reflect, namely bone formation markers and bone resorption markers (Seibel et al., 2005 & 2006; Vasikaran et al., 2008).

Circulating or excretion bone markers are high in the first 2 years of life, decrease in childhood, increase again during puberty and decrease thereafter to the lower levels seen in adulthood (Prentice et al., 2006). Thus, the concentrations or outputs of these markers are significantly affected by both physiological (age, gender, growth velocity, nutritional status and pubertal status) and pathological conditions (prematurity, growth hormone deficiency, malnutrition, malabsorption, vitamin D deficiency, and metastatic bone disease) especially in children who, compared to adults have dramatically elevated bone marker concentrations due to high skeletal growth velocity and rapid bone turnover (Fares et al., 2003; Yang &Grey, 2006; Atkinson, 2008). Biochemical assessment of markers of bone turnover may be important in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of bone metabolism disease (Vasikaran et al., 2008). These markers can be assessed in both serum and urine samples. Compared to adults, in children, it is difficult to collect reliable serial samples especially from complete time urine collections. To adjust such data, they are often normalized and reported as analyte/creatinine ratio (Yang &Grey, 2006). This ratio itself is limited by considerable biological variation and change in creatinine levels with age as muscle mass increases (Szulc et al., 2000). For this reason it is preferable to measure bone biochemical markers in serum samples. This review will therefore discuss the various serum bone markers used for assessing bone health and the factors that may influence their utility.

B. Bone Formation Markers

Active osteoblasts produce bone formation markers. They are expressed during different phases of osteoblast development and are considered to reflect different aspects of osteoblast function and of bone formation. Serum markers of bone formation, include bone alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin and procollagen I propeptides (Vasikaran et al., 2008). Biological variation necessitates that particular attention be paid to the pre-analytical variables such as diurnal variation, stability of the marker and tissue specificity. Some of these are summarized in table 1A.

B1. Bone Alkaline Phosphatase
In serum, total alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity is a combination of four isoenzymes; liver/bone, placental, intestinal, and germ cell. During skeletal growth in children and adolescents the bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) predominates and contributes up to 90% of the total alkaline phosphatase. (Van Hoof et al., 1990; Magnusson et al., 1999).

Older techniques to distinguish the different isoenzymes such as heat inactivation and electrophoresis are labor-intensive by nature and lack sensitivity and specificity. Measurement of AP activity both before and after lectin precipitation is inexpensive but lacks reproducibility due to variation between batches of lectin. Immunoassays specific for BAP have been described and are now commercially available for clinical use (Alkphase-B kit, Metra Biosystems, USA; Ostase, Beckman Access, Beckman-Coulter Inc, USA) (Yang & Grey , 2006) . The ease of measurement, cost efficiency and higher specificity in detecting small changes in bone formation, makes BAP a good marker for bone formation (Vasikaran et al., 2008). Additionally, BAP serum levels show no circadian variations, probably due to the relatively long half-live of 1 to 2 days (Yang & Grey , 2006). These assays represent an improvement on total alkaline phosphatase activity measurement and better reflect bone turnover both in postmenopausal osteoporosis and following antiresorptive therapy (Rauch et al., 2002). However, one drawback of these assays is the residual low cross-reactivity (16%) with liver AP. Therefore, in subjects with high liver AP, results of BAP measurements may be artificially high, leading to false positive results (Langlois et al., 1994; Woitge et al., 1996; Martin et al., 1997).

Age related changes in serum BAP levels correlate positively and significantly with height velocity in both genders. Age-related and pubertal staging reference values are available from several publications (table 1A). In growth hormone-deficient children serum BAP levels increase significantly after growth hormone therapy suggesting its use in monitoring therapy.

B2. Osteocalcin
Osteocalcin (OC) is a 5700 dalton protein synthesized by the osteoblast and the most abundant non-collagenous protein of bone matrix. Upon synthesis OC is released in circulation, where it has a short half-life and is rapidly (5 minutes) cleared by the kidneys. In addition to the intact molecule, various fragments that accumulate are also found in the circulation. Serum OC has been proposed as a specific and sensitive marker for bone formation because it is both present in bone tissue as well as increasing significantly during advanced and enhanced skeletal growth (Yang &Grey, 2006).

The hydroxyapatite-binding function of osteocalcin necessary for bone mineralisation requires the post-translational carboxylation of the 3 γ-glutamic acid residues (Glu) to γ-- carboxyglutamic acid (Gla) by a vitamin K dependent carboxylase (Binkley & Suttie, 1995). Inadequate dietary vitamin K intake results in increased levels of undercarboxylated osteocalcin (Glu-OC) in healthy children (Van Summeren et al., 2007). Methods have been developed to distinguish between carboxylated and undercarboxylated fractions of osteocalcin and % Glu-OC is often used as an indicator of vitamin K status (Knapen et al., 1996; Gundberg et al., 1998 ). Several studies have suggested that an increase in the percentage Glu-OC may be associated with an increased incidence of bone fractures in post-menopausal women. (Sokoll et al., 1996; Vermeer et al., 2004; Booth et al 2003) . In girls, better vitamin K status (expressed as %Glu-OC) was associated with reduced bone turnover ( Kalkwarf et al., 2004) . Similarly, O�Connor et al, (2007) confirmed in peri-pubertal Danish girls that better vitamin K status, as indicated by lower Glu-OC, positively correlated with BMC of the total body and lumbar spine. Overall, it is reasonable to conclude that vitamin K status may play an important role in determining the bone quality in children.

Several immunoassays have been developed to measure serum OC concentrations and particular attention to pre-analytical parameters is important (Table 2). As there is no international standard for the measurement of osteocalcin and because both intact molecule and various accumulated fragments are present in circulation, the assay results can vary considerably. This reflects their differing abilities to detect these OC fragments. Since, a significant fraction of the intact osteocalcin molecule is rapidly converted to a large N-terminal mid-molecule (1-43 amino acids) fragment both in vivo and in vitro, assays that are specific to the intact molecule but also detect this large fragment are currently used because they are more robust as well as sensitive. These assays do not distinguish between Glu-OC and osteocalcin. Age-related and pubertal staging reference values for osteocalcin are available from several publications (Table 1A).

B3. Type I procollagen peptide

The procollagen type I peptides are derived from the most abundant form of collagen found in bone, collagen type I and considered quantitative measures of newly formed collagen type I because they are cleaved from the procollagen type 1 when it is secreted into the extracellular matrix (Liu et al., 1995). These precursor molecules are characterized by short terminal extension-peptides: the amino (N-) terminal propeptide (PINP) and the carboxy (C-) terminal propeptide (PICP) (Merry et al., 1976). Type I collagen propeptides may also arise from other sources, such as skin, tendons and joints or cartilage. Both PICP and PINP can be measured in serum as markers of bone formation, and the factors affecting the assay are shown in Table 1A. Commercial immunoassays are available for both propeptides. PINP (Roche Elecsys, Mannheim, Germany) and PICP (sandwich ELISA, Metra Biosystems GmbH Osnabruck, Germany). In practice, PINP shows greater diagnostic value than PICP as a bone-formation marker (Robins et al.,1999; von der Mark et al., 1999) .

C. Bone Resorption Markers


There are several bone resorption markers: hydroxyproline, hydroxylysine, and the various forms of pyridinium crosslinks. These are all products of collagen degradation released during degradation of bone-collagen. All are released into circulation and excreted into urine and thus are usually measured in urine (Seibel et al., 2005). However, as mentioned above the difficulty of obtaining serial urine collections coupled with their relatively large intra-individual or biological variation limits their utility. The C- and N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen are commonly used serum bone resorption markers which can be measured in children (Table 1B).

C1. Cross-linked Telopeptides.
The crosslinked telopeptides are derived specifically from the amino terminal (NTX) and the carboxyterminal (CTX) regions of type I collagen during bone resorption. They are crosslinked through Pyr and DPD and are shown to be specific and sensitive markers of bone resorption (Yang & Grey, 2006; Siebel et al., 2006). There are four possible isomers of CTX the native α-L form and the β isomerised L (β-L) form. Originally, a radioimmunoassay (RIA) was developed against the C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen generated by matrix metalloproteinases (CTX-MMP, also called ICTP) in serum (Risteli et al., 1993). Since then, several assays against the C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) have been developed and are grouped under the CrossLaps label. β-CTX in serum is measured using a sandwich ELISA, which utilizes a high-affinity polyclonal antibody against the β-isomerized Cterminal octapeptide attached to the ELISA plate (Bonde et al., 1997). Currently, a newer version of this assay uses two monoclonal antibodies against collagen type I C-telopeptide fragments containing two cross-linked EKAHD-β-GGR epitopes (Rosenquist et al., 1998). An automated CTX assay, the Beta-CrossLaps/serum assay on the Roche Elecsys (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) is now available (Okabe et al., 2004). A serum NTX assay using a monoclonal antibody against an epitope on the alpha-2 chain of type I collagen (Gertz et al., 1994) is also available (Maeno et al., 2005). These assays appear to be stable at room temperature.

D. Biological Variation


There is significant within-subject variability in most bone turnover markers consequently limiting their practical and diagnostic utility. Knowledge of the sources of variability can reduce the �background noise� and provide more meaningful interpretation of bone markers. The ideal marker and assay is characterized by both excellent analytical performance (i.e. high precision and accuracy) and by minimal and predictable pre-analytical variability (Seibel et al., 2005). The relevant pre-analytical factors affecting bone biomarker variability are summarized in Table 2.

There are two groups of pre-analytical variables: the first group includes the biological or uncontrollable factors, such as age, gender, ethnicity, pubertal or menopausal status, or recent fracture; second group are the controllable factors such as circadian rhythm, diet or menstrual cycle effects (Glover et al., 2008). Many biological factors cannot be modified at all, while others are hard to control in clinical practice. Therefore, in establishing reference intervals factors such as age, gender and pubertal status must be taken into account. To minimise some of the limitations of the controllable factors linked to pre-analytical and analytical variability, standardised sampling (fasting, time of collection) and sample handling (analyte stability) are mandatory to obtain reliable and clinically relevant results. Even though most markers in current use are not significantly directly affected by food intake, it is possible to reduce the effects of diurnal variation by standardizing sample collection by ensuring the collection be done in the morning and in the fasting state. (Clowes et al., 2002). The specific considerations for some of the biomarkers are presented in Table 1A &B. Overall, if bone turnover markers are to be used clinically, then appropriate interpretation of the biochemical markers must consider all sources of variability that include the pre-analytical variability and the analytical performance of the assay (Glover et al., 2008).

When comparing measurements taken by DXA vs. laboratory testing using biochemical markers it is observed that although BMD measurement by DXA has low imprecision (around 1% at the lumbar spine), the magnitude of changes following treatment are also relatively small. On the other hand, bone-turnover markers may show more rapid changes soon after initiating treatment, which may be useful in management of bone disease. Standardizing pre-analytical procedures will limit inter-assay variability and therefore improve interpretation.

E. Pediatric Reference Range for Serum Bone Markers

Assessment of metabolic bone disorders and monitoring of antiresorptive therapy or disease progression requires the use of normal pediatric reference ranges for both serum bone formation and resorption markers (Rauchenzauner et al., 2007). Usage of bone markers as risk of bone disease or monitoring therapy is rather different in adults vs. children. In adults, bone turnover markers primarily correspond to bone remodeling and are usually used as independent predictors of the risk of osteoporosis and fractures (Miller et al., 2005; Nishizawa et al., 2004), to monitor antiresorptive therapy (Hochberg et al., 2002; Bonnick et al., 2006) and also have a promising role in metastatic bone disease (Hannon et al., 2006). However, in children, these markers are released into the circulation during the processes of bone remodeling, modeling, and growth in length. There are significant changes in levels of bone formation and resorption markers with age during skeletal growth and puberty and these also correlate with growth velocity (Crofton et al., 1998; de Ridder et al., 1998). Therefore it is essential that longitudinal measurement in patients is compared to the age-related values of reference data.

For establishing paediatric reference ranges for bone markers and assessing their relation to sex, age, pubertal status and anthropometric data, a large population of healthy children is required. In the past, most such normative studies established reference ranges using low subject numbers. A recent study (Rauchenzauner et al., 2007) conducted using a large cohort of 572 healthy children aged 2 months to 18 years, aimed to establish sex- and age specific reference equations for OC, BAP, ICTP and CTX in healthy children and adolescents, thus enabling calculation of SD-scores (SDS). Their results provided reference curves for OC, BALP, CTX and ICTP in healthy children. They found that taller and heavier individuals for age had greater bone marker concentrations, likely reflecting greater growth velocity. SDS for markers of bone formation, collagen degradation, and phosphatases were each independently correlated, suggesting they derive from the same biological processes. They suggested that with the possibility of calculating SDS, monitoring of antiresorptive therapy or disease progression in children with metabolic bone disease will be facilitated (Rauchenzauner et al., 2007).

Many studies have established reference ranges in healthy children. However, the status of the micronutrients that may influence bone health such as, vitamin D and vitamin K is not often taken into account. There is wide variation between nutrient-based dietary reference intakes (DRI) in various countries and there is some concern that even in a healthy child, intakes of some bone nutrients may not be optimal (Prentice et al., 2006). One example is the recommendations for vitamin D. Recent studies have suggested that the optimal serum levels of 25OH vitamin D should be 75nmol/L. With this threshold, many healthy infants and children would have suboptimal levels (Gregory et al., 2000; Gordon et al.,2008). There is also some concern that vitamin K intakes may be lower than desirable (Kalkwarf et al., 2004). In the establishment of normative reference values the relationship of bone biochemical markers to these nutritional parameters should be considered.

F. Conclusion

There is a systematic process of growth in children, starting with the synthesis of soft tissue, followed by epiphyseal bone growth and with extensive bone modeling and re-modeling. To assess changes in these processes, absolute bone mineral content, 2-D measurement of bone mass using DXA (BMD) or 3-D measurement of bone geometry, mass and density using quantitative computed tomography are used. However, the use of biochemical markers provides a dynamic picture of whole body bone turnover and thus complements the static measures of bone. These can be repeated at much shorter intervals; thus, the dynamic assessment helps to detect effects of disease or therapy much before changes in bone mass or progression in bone disease can be ascertained. The clinical usefulness of these tests is greatly enhanced if effort is made to minimize biological variation by using standardized sampling and sample handling. Since, bone marker concentrations can be similar in a child with high bone remodelling and low growth rate and in a normally growing child, it is essential to be aware of growth velocity and pubertal development to correctly interpret the results. Further attention should be given to the nutritional parameters of bone health in developing adequate reference values in healthy children.

Table 1A. Bone Formation Markers


Table 1B. Bone Resorption Markers


Table 2. Sources of pre-analytical variability


References

1. Vasikaran SD. Utility of biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in management of osteoporosis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2008;45(2):221- 58. Review.
2. Downey,P.A., Siegel,M.I. Bone biology and the clinical implications for osteoporosis. Phys.Ther., 2006;86,77-91.
3. Prentice A, Schoenmakers I, Laskey MA, de Bono S, Ginty F, Goldberg GR. Nutrition and bone growth and development. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006 Nov;65(4):348- 60. Review.
4. Ho,A.Y., Kung,A.W. Determinants of peak bone mineral density and bone area in young women. J.Bone Miner.Metab,2005; 23,470-475.
5. Specker,B. Are Activity and Diet Really Important for Children's Bones? Nutr.Today, 2002; 37,44-49.
6. Atkinson SA. Vitamin D status and bone biomarkers in childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Feb;50(2 Suppl):479-82; discussion 486. Review.
7. Seibel MJ. Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover Part II: Clinical Applications Biochemical markers of bone turnover: part I: biochemistry and variability. Clin Biochem Rev. 2005 Nov;26(4):97-122.
8. Laskey MA, Murgatroyd PR, Prentice A. Do appendicular bone measurements reflect changes in the axial skeleton?: the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and ultrasound measurements during lactation. J Clin Densitom. 2004 Fall;7(3):296-301.
9. Ginty F, Rennie KL, Mills L, Stear S, Jones S, Prentice A.Positive, site-specific associations between bone mineral status, fitness, and time spent at high-impact activities in 16- to 18-year-old boys. Bone. 2005 Jan;36(1):101-10. Epub 2004 Nov 24.
10. Compston,J.E., Cooper,C., and Kanis,J.A. Bone densitometry in clinical practice. BMJ 1995; 310,1507-1510.
11. Kalkwarf HJ, Zemel BS, Gilsanz V, Lapp JM, Horlick M, Obersfield S, Mahboubi S, Fan B, Frederick MM, Winer K and Shepherd JA. The bone mineral density in childhood study: bone mineral content and density according to age, sex, and race. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:2087-2099
12. Van der Sluis IM, de Ridder MAL, Boot AM et al. Reference data for one density and body composition measured with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in white children and young adults. Arch Did Child 2002; 87:341-47.
13. Goulding,A., Gold,E., Cannan,R., Williams,S., and Lewis-Barned,N.J. Changing femoral geometry in growing girls: a cross-sectional DEXA study. Bone 1996; 19,645-649.
14. Seibel MJ. Clinical application of biochemical markers of bone turnover. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006 Aug;50(4):603-20. Review.
15. Fares JE, Choucair M, Nabulsi M, Salamoun M, Shahine CH, Fuleihan Gel-H. Effect of gender, puberty, and vitamin D status on biochemical markers of bone remodedeling. Bone. 2003 Aug;33(2):242-7.
16. Yang L, Grey V. Pediatric reference intervals for bone markers. Clin Biochem. 2006 Jun;39(6):561-8. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
17. Szulc P, Seeman E, Delmas PD. Biochemical measurements of bone turnover in children and adolescents. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:281�294.
18. Van Hoof VO, Holyaerts MF, Geryl H, Van Mullem M, Lepoutre LG, De Broe ME. Age and sex distribution of alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes by agarose electrophoresis. Clin Chem. 1990;36:875�8.
19. Magnusson P, Larsson L, Magnusson M, Davie MW, Sharp CA. Isoforms of bone alkaline phosphatase: characterisation and origin in human trabecular and cortical bone. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1926�33.
20. Rauch F, Georg M, Stabrey A, Neu C, Blum WF, Remer T, Manz F, Schoenau E.Collagen markers deoxypyridinoline and hydroxylysine glycosides: pediatric reference data and use for growth prediction in growth hormone-deficient children. Clin Chem. 2002 Feb;48(2):315-22.
21. Langlois MR, Delanghe JR, Kaufman JM, De Buyzere ML, Van Hoecke MJ, Leroux-Roels GG. Posttranslational heterogeneity of bone alkaline phosphatase in metabolic bone disease. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1994;32:675�80
22. Woitge H, Seibel MJ, Ziegler R. Comparison of total and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase in patients with nonskeletal disorders or metabolic bone disease. Clin Chem. 1996;42:1796�804.
23. Martin M, Van Hoof V, Couttenye M, Prove A, Blokx P. Analytical and clinical evaluation of a method to quantify bone alkaline phosphatase, a marker of osteoblastic activity. Anticancer Research. 1997;17:3167�70.
24. Binkley NC, Suttie JW. Vitamin K nutrition and osteoporosis. J. Nutr 1995; 1812-21
25. van Summeren M, Braam L, Noirt F, Kuis W, Vermeer C. Pronounced elevation of undercarboxylated osteocalcin in healthy children. Pediatr Res. 2007 Mar;61(3):366-70.
26. Knapen MH, Eisenwiener HG, Vermeer C. Osteocalcin detection in aging serum and whole blood: stability of different osteocalcin fractions. Clin Chim Acta 1996; 256:151�164
27. Gundberg CM, Nieman SD, Abrams S, Rosen H. Vitamin K status and bone health: an analysis of methods for determination of undercarboxylated osteocalcin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:3258�3266
28. Sokoll LJ, Sadowski JA. Comparison of biochemical indexes for assessing vitamin K nutritional status in a healthy adult population. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:566�573
29. Vermeer C, Shearer MJ, Zittermann A, Bolton-Smith C, Szulc P, Hodges S, Walter P, Rambeck W, Stocklin E, Weber P. Beyond deficiency: potential benefits of increased intakes of vitamin K for bone and vascular health. Eur J Nutr 2004; 43:325�335
30. Booth SL, Broe KE, Gagnon DR, Tucker KL, Hannan MT, McLean RR, Dawson- Hughes B, Wilson PW, Cupples LA, Kiel DP.Vitamin K intake and bone mineral density in women and men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Feb;77(2):512-6.
31. Kalkwarf HJ, Khoury JC, Bean J, Elliot JG. Vitamin K, bone turnover, and bone mass in girls. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80:1075�1080
32. O'Connor E, M�lgaard C, Michaelsen KF, Jakobsen J, Lamberg-Allardt CJ, Cashman KD. Serum percentage undercarboxylated osteocalcin, a sensitive Eapen et al. eJIFCC 2008, 19 (2) Bone Health in Childhood 13 measure of vitamin K status, and its relationship to bone health indices in Danish girls. Br J Nutr. 2007 Apr;97(4):661-6
33. Liu, SH.;Yang, RS.;al-Shaikh, R.; Lane, JM. Collagen in tendon, ligament, and bone healing. A current review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995. pp. 265�78
34. Merry AH, Harwood R, Wooley DE, Grant ME, Jackson DS. Identification and partial characterisation of the non-collagenous amino- and carboxy-terminal extension peptides of cartilage procollagen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976;71:83�90
35. Robins SP. Fibrillogenesis and maturation of collagens. In: Dynamics of Bone and Cartilage Metabolism, Seibel MJ, Robins SP, Bilezikian JP eds. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999 p 31�42.
36. von der Mark K. Structure and Biosynthesis of Collagens. In: Dynamics of Bone and Cartilage Metabolism, Seibel M, Robins S, Bilezikian J eds. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999 p 3�30.
37. Risteli, J., Elomaa, I., Niemi, S., Novamo, A. and Risteli, L. Radioimmunoassay for the pyridinoline cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen: a new serum marker of bone collagen degradation. Clin Chem 1993; 39 , pp. 35-40.
38. Bonde, M., Garnero, P., Fledelius, C., Qvist, P., Delmas, P. D. and Christiansen, C. Measurement of bone degradation products in serum using antibodies reactive with an isomerized form of an 8 amino acid sequence of the Ctelopeptide of type I collagen. J Bone Miner Res 1197; 12 , pp. 1028-1034.
39. Rosenquist, C., Fledelius, C., Christgau, S., Pedersen, B. J., Bonde, M., Qvist, P. and Christiansen, C. Serum CrossLaps One Step ELISA. First application of monoclonal antibodies for measurement in serum of bone-related degradation products from C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen. Clin Chem 1998; 44 , pp. 2281-2289.
40. Okabe, R., Inaba, M., Nakatsuka, K., Miki, T., Naka, H., Moriguchi, A. and Nishizawa, Y. Significance of serum CrossLaps as a predictor of changes in bone mineral density during estrogen replacement therapy; comparison with serum carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen and urinary deoxypyridinoline. J Bone Miner Metab 2004; 22 , pp. 127-131.
41. Gertz, B. J., Shao, P., Hanson, D. A., Quan, H., Harris, S. T., Genant, H. K., Chesnut 3rd, C. H. and Eyre, D. R. Monitoring bone resorption in early postmenopausal women by an immunoassay for cross-linked collagen peptides in urine. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9 , pp. 135-142.
42. Maeno, Y., Inaba, M., Okuno, S., Yamakawa, T., Ishimura, E. and Nishizawa, Y. Serum concentrations of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen: new marker for bone resorption in hemodialysis patients. Clin Chem 2004; 51 , pp. 2312-2317.
43. Glover SJ, Garnero P, Naylor K, Rogers A, Eastell R. Establishing a reference range for bone turnover markers in young, healthy women. Bone. 2008 Apr;42(4):623-30. Epub 2008 Jan 5.
44. Clowes JA, Hannon RA, Yap TS, Hoyle NR, Blumsohn A, Eastell R. Effect of feeding on bone turnover markers and its impact on biological variability of measurements. Bone. 2002 Jun;30(6):886-90. Eapen et al. eJIFCC 2008, 19 (2) Bone Health in Childhood 14
45. Rauchenzauner M, Schmid A, Heinz-Erian P, Kapelari K, Falkensammer G, Griesmacher A, Finkenstedt G, H�gler W. Sex- and age-specific reference curves for serum markers of bone turnover in healthy children from 2 months to 18 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Feb;92(2):443-9. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
46. Miller PD, Shergy WJ, Body JJ, Chen P, Rohe ME, Krege JH.Longterm reduction of back pain risk in women with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide compared with alendronate. J Rheumatol 2005; 32:1556�1562
47. Miller PD. Bone density and markers of bone turnover in predicting fracture risk and how changes in these measures predict fracture risk reduction. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2005. 3:103�110.
48. Nishizawa Y, Nakamura T, Ohta H, Kushida K, Gorai I, Shiraki M, Fukunaga M, Hosoi T, Miki T, Chaki O, Ichimura S, Nakatsuka K, Miura M 2005 Guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 2004; 23:97�104.
49. Hochberg MC, Greenspan S, Wasnich RD, Miller P, Thompson DE, Ross PD. Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:1586�1592
50. Bonnick SL, Shulman L. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, or both? Am J Med 2006;119:S25�31.
51. Hannon RA, Eastell R. Bone markers and current laboratory assays. Cancer Treat 2006;Rev 32(Suppl 1):7�14
52. Crofton PM, Kelnar CJ.Bone and collagen markers in paediatric practice. Int J Clin Pract 1998;52:557�565
53. de Ridder CM, Delemarre-van de Waal HA. Clinical utility of markers of bone turnover in children and adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr 1998;10:441�448
54. Gordon CM, Feldman HA, Sinclair L, Williams AL, Kleinman PK, Perez- Rossello J, Cox JE. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy infants and toddlers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jun;162(6):505-12.
55. Gregory J, Lower S, Bates C, Prentice A, Jackson L, Smithers G, Wenlock R, Farron M. National diet adn nutriction survey: young people aged 4 to 18 yrs. 2000 Vol. 1. Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: The Stationary office.
56. Chailurkit LO, Suthutvoravut U, Mahachoklertwattana P, Charoenkiatkul S, Rajatanavin R. Biochemical markers of bone formation in Thai children and adolescents. Endocr Res. 2005;31(3):159-69

Copyright © 2008 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). All rights reserved.

 
Website developed by Insoft Digital